Follow along in the book HERE. Today's song is at #40 and is featured on pages 259-264. See the full list of their Top 100 Beatles Songs HERE.
"Across the Universe"
Let It Be
1970
I guess we don't talk about covers too much in this column. The book makes sure to list in their trivia sections the artists who have covered each song, but I haven't mentioned them here, because that doesn't really interest me. I want to know why Spignesi and Lewis like a song and I want to understand why I like or don't like the same song, but I have no desire to give a shit about why (using the bands who have covered "Across the Universe" according to the book as examples here) 10cc and David Bowie enjoy a Beatles song enough to cover it.
However, if my memory serves me correctly—no guarantees—then I'm pretty sure "Across the Universe" first found its way into my ears via a cover. This was via the I Am Sam movie soundtrack, which my cousin-not-related Jess had brought to the annual Poconos trip one year, and I borrowed it for a few spins, and I guess this was prior to becoming familiar with the Beatles in any significant capacity. It's not like I went home and purchased the soundtrack. It could be that today was the first time I've heard Rufus Wainwright's version of "Across the Universe" since that weekend. Still, maybe it's significant to point out that I was familiar with a cover version before I was familiar with the original studio album version.
However, if my memory serves me correctly—no guarantees—then I'm pretty sure "Across the Universe" first found its way into my ears via a cover. This was via the I Am Sam movie soundtrack, which my cousin-not-related Jess had brought to the annual Poconos trip one year, and I borrowed it for a few spins, and I guess this was prior to becoming familiar with the Beatles in any significant capacity. It's not like I went home and purchased the soundtrack. It could be that today was the first time I've heard Rufus Wainwright's version of "Across the Universe" since that weekend. Still, maybe it's significant to point out that I was familiar with a cover version before I was familiar with the original studio album version.
That's only significant because the book makes a big deal about the "different versions" of "Across the Universe. I guess this is their way of justifying a #40 ranking for a song that, in its original and official format, sounds like absolute dogshit. I'm talking about audio fidelity here, not the songwriting, which is pretty impeccable like always. And I'm not even the guy who cares about the quality of the recording of a song most of the time; I'm ripping mp3s from shady sources and using $5 earbuds to hear them, and I'm totally cool with that. But even I can hear the Let It Be version of "Across the Universe" and know that it's a piss-poor quality.
And also slowed down? It just feels sluggish. I don't get why this is the version that made the album, although that probably has a lot to do with Phil Spector making decisions without the Beatles' input. On Let It Be... Naked, Paul's 2003 version of Let It Be, we get an "Across the Universe" that is crisp and clean and at regular speed. Even the alternate version that's found on Past Masters Vol. Two and features animal noises (it was originally included on a charity compilation benefiting wildlife) sounds better. And then you can go through the archives and find some snippets of versions lost in time—one with just humming, one with a rhythm track, and so on.
It's time to admit that I don't really care about any of this, to be honest. It just all seems like a little much. It feels like going to an art museum and obsessing over the brand of paint that the artist used. That's not really the point of art. It couldn't be. I get more out of staring at a work of art and examining how it makes me feel than understanding how that art came to be in the first place. I like "Across the Universe," and it's neither because or despite the fact that it may or may not be a "finished" version, or that it sounds of poor quality.
It's time to admit that I don't really care about any of this, to be honest. It just all seems like a little much. It feels like going to an art museum and obsessing over the brand of paint that the artist used. That's not really the point of art. It couldn't be. I get more out of staring at a work of art and examining how it makes me feel than understanding how that art came to be in the first place. I like "Across the Universe," and it's neither because or despite the fact that it may or may not be a "finished" version, or that it sounds of poor quality.
I like it because it sounds like poetry, and I have fun parsing through why that chorus of "nothing's going to change my world" feels so poignant to me (as it does to many others, obviously). The verses speak of beauty and change, but the chorus feels stubborn. Almost as if Lennon is saying that he is set in his ways. Which seems weird and not quite right. Maybe it's more that the narrator of the chorus is the unreliable one, and that we are supposed to feel uncomfortable with that stubborn statement, especially in light of all the evidence presented in the verses? Something like that.
But you see how that's much better than talking about the fucking audio quality, right? It's more fun being obsessive about emotion than being obsessive about function. I'm clearly getting a little tired of how artlessly this fucking book presents the music of the Beatles. There is so much to explore within the self as it is unlocked by this precious music, and the fact that these jabronis can only see the shiny exterior honestly makes me a bit nauseous at times. Almost as nauseous as the niche obsession that Beatles fans briefly had in the mid-'00s over the I Am Sam soundtrack.
BEATLES TRIVIA: The book also attempts to do the John v. Paul thing again, which I find equally exhausting. Yes, we get it, two music geniuses butted heads. John claimed (via Playboy, of fucking course) that he felt butthurt over the fact that his songs "weren't taken as seriously" as Paul's songs were. He says that with Paul's songs, every note was in order, to an almost obsessive degree, but when it came time for John's songs, a "looseness" suddenly appeared in the studio, as if John's songs were less important to get right. I guess the overarching point of bringing this up in the "Across the Universe" chapter is that this might explain why the final version sounds terrible. And I don't know if this even counts as trivia; I do, however, find it a lot more fascinating to hear about John felt about his own music within the context of the Beatles than I do about alternate versions of the same song.
BEATLES TRIVIA: The book also attempts to do the John v. Paul thing again, which I find equally exhausting. Yes, we get it, two music geniuses butted heads. John claimed (via Playboy, of fucking course) that he felt butthurt over the fact that his songs "weren't taken as seriously" as Paul's songs were. He says that with Paul's songs, every note was in order, to an almost obsessive degree, but when it came time for John's songs, a "looseness" suddenly appeared in the studio, as if John's songs were less important to get right. I guess the overarching point of bringing this up in the "Across the Universe" chapter is that this might explain why the final version sounds terrible. And I don't know if this even counts as trivia; I do, however, find it a lot more fascinating to hear about John felt about his own music within the context of the Beatles than I do about alternate versions of the same song.
BETTER BEATLE: "Don't Let Me Down," a song that was for some fucking reason left off of Let It Be by Spector, which should prove definitively that the dude was a fucking moron. Leaving that off and leaving the shitty version of "Across the Universe" in probably should have earned him more jail time than the murder he committed thirty years later.
NEXT TIME: It's #41 with "Lady Madonna," but if I'm being honest with you, I'm thinking that I might take a break from this column for the summer. As with all blog projects with a finite ending, you can rest assured that I will return eventually. But something's gotta give, and so why not this, and why not now. Use this time to catch up with the archives, and let me know if you are getting anything out of this project or if it's one of those things that is completely ignored on the blog.








