I'm working my way through a list of movies I've never seen before. You can find the list HERE. I'm doing this shit alphabetically. Let's go.
Blade Runner
1982
I'm finding it a little difficult to gather all my thoughts about Blade Runner and organize them, so I thought that I might first start by doing that, and then going into detail for each point. I realize that this will result in a someone stilted opening to what will no doubt be an otherwise flawless essay, but it's what I gotta do for this movie.
My immediate reaction was that I did not like Blade Runner. It was difficult to get through a viewing, even broken up into a few pieces (it's tough to find time to watch a movie when Pam does not want to watch that movie). My next thought was an equivocation—well, I might not have liked it overall, but it was at least interesting to look at and to experience that world. In other words, if we're talking purely about aesthetics, this was a really well-made movie. After a while, though, my thoughts moved toward the question, "Is there more to this than I originally thought?" In other words, am I just a neophyte who didn't get it, and might appreciate it after further research and subsequent viewings?
And now, one at a time.
The first thing I said after the credits start to roll and I took off my headphones was to Pam: "You made the right call bailing on Blade Runner." From a plot standpoint, I'll back any claim that says that Blade Runner was a little dull. If we're talking about what happens from Point A to Point B (from, say, Deckard getting an assignment to kill some Replicants, to Deckard completing that task), there's really not a whole lot that happens. Some clues are followed, some guns are fired, Harrison Ford looks grumpy, and then curtains.
Perhaps this is just a general problem I have with noir film in general. The ace detective gets the case, he follows each clue to its endpoint, and eventually, the villain is caught red-handed. The genre doesn't leave a whole lot of room for surprises. Of course, Blade Runner only uses those basic tropes and builds an entire magnificent sci-fi dystopia around them, but we'll get to that.
The movie I thought about a lot in conjunction with Blade Runner was weirdly The Big Lebowski, which also plays with noir tropes. Lebowski, however, takes it in the other direction—makes noir light-hearted and allows the "dick" to comment continuously on how silly noir tropes are. Blade Runner is intensely serious, and because of that, it doesn't leave space to do anything with the neo noir structure besides following it through to its very normal conclusion.
It's probable that the neo noir aspects of Blade Runner are the least important in the grand scheme of things, and if that's the case, then that's on me for being bored by them. In none of the interviews with the key players—director Ridley Scott, stars Ford and Rutger Hauer, screenwriters or artistic designers or producers or editors—do I see any mention of this aspect of the film, nor are any critics building their theses around it. Shitting on Blade Runner because of the basis of the plot would be like throwing away a bicycle because the tires are flat. There's more to this machine than just plot.
Visuals, special effects, art and color and sights and sounds, these aren't necessarily things that I'm thinking about as I'm watching a movie. But I could see the argument that Blade Runner is valuable just based on these things alone, because they were pretty visually stunning, all things considered. Shit like the dark cinematography mixed with bright neon lights and billboards, the crushing claustrophobia of the packed streets under a constant rainy downpour, flying cars and robot flips, all of it contributed to a very vivid and real movie experience.
Everything we know now as "cyberpunk" seems to have started here. It's a sort of dreary sci-fi near- or post-apocalyptic style, in which people wear clearly futuristic clothing but still manage to appear ratty and disheveled. There were multiple times when I thought to myself, "Hmm, this looks like [something else]," and then thought that Blade Runner probably influenced that thing. I will say this: There is nothing about this movie that seems like 1982—even if November 2019 didn't end up actually being this bleak, Blade Runner might as well be a movie that was made at that time. Visually, it absolutely holds up.
Okay, so, what, a sci-fi neo noir film that's a bit light on plot but heavy on beautiful window dressings? Is that what Blade Runner is? Of course not. When I finished watching, I was absolutely tempted to make that claim, but I know it's not true.
I have this habit of movies that I don't immediately appreciate to hand-wave away all the important "big idea" questions that the movie presents. Like, I'll say something like, "Sure, the movie presented themes of X and Y, and really could make one question Z, but I didn't really like it, so do those themes and questions really matter?" Duh, of course they do. So here I am, making an honest effort to find appreciation in Blade Runner after the fact.
Not every movie is going to be immediately loved. Sometimes it's gotta sink in. Especially a movie like Blade Runner, and especially if you are an idiot like me who needs his hand held every once in a while. I thought the famous "tears in the rain" monologue was touching, but I needed some time to process what it actually meant, ya know? I'm not that good at processing and analyzing movies, at least not yet.
The opening crawl immediately presents the theme of robots—apparently, the robots (or, "replicants"), were built, but gained consciousness and are trying to rebel. This isn't really a new theme in sci-fi (though, again, it's not new to me because I've seen entertainments that Blade Runner influenced, not the other way around). Killing robots isn't called murder, it's called "retirement." We as the audience are left to question who is the real villain here, and it's a question that our hero will undoubtedly answer by the end of the film (that he escapes with a replicant that he may or may not romantically love should serve as that answer).
After thinking about it for a while longer, I guess the ultimate question presented by the film is: What does it mean to be human? That's a "big idea" question if I ever heard one. By the end of the movie, it's pretty clear that the movie is questioning the idea of humanity, both literally (is Deckard a replicant?) to figuratively (why is it that the humans in this movie seem to lack empathy compared to the replicants?). There's the famous "tears in rain" monologue, given by the ostensible villain, a replicant:
It's... what the fuck am I even doing? I'm padding this blog post out way too much, you guys. Never Seen It doesn't have to be this complicated. It can't be. I don't have time. This blog series has become a sincere pain in my side, and I'm only seventeen posts into a 200-post series. I can't do this. Let this become tears in the rain.
For real. I've just decided this now, the morning after a shitshow of a presidential debate, after like four hours of sleep—I can't write 4000 words about movies anymore. Not in 2020, anyway. I know you were expecting a big "Who's Involved" section and all that, but I just don't have the time or energy. From now on, Never Seen It is going to be short-form thoughts and immediate reactions (will still do occasional interviews with friends too).
Please forgive me while I duck out and leave you with this: Blade Runner has some heady shit to say, and I appreciate thinking about it, but man, it was kind of a drag for the first 9/10ths of its running time. I can even leave some other notes for you:
- It was nice seeing E.B. Farnum playing a good-hearted character.
- His mansion looked like the cyberpunk version of Sleuth's mansion.
- The soundtrack sounded like something from the bridge of a 17-minute Pink Floyd song.
- I'm glad Sean Young wasn't forced to play a character involved in blatant transphobia this time.
- I'd be down to watch Blade Runner 2049, I guess.
That's it for me. Good luck, god speed, see ya next time.
GRADE: 2.5 pukes out of 5
~~~~~~~~
NEXT TIME: We watch a horror movie that launched a thousand shitty parodies, The Blair Witch Project.















