Look, I'm going to say something, and it's going to seem like hyperbole, but I swear that it's not. I mean this with all my heart. I am not exaggerating. I promise. Here you are:
This album is the most batshit crazy response to "what is your favorite album" that has ever been made.
I don't make it a practice of judging people for their tastes in music, unless you're dishonest about your music preferences (say, for political reasons), or if you're, like, glibly listening to music made by rapists because you don't have a problem with rape. If you're listening to music because you want to listen to what you enjoy and because it gives you pleasure to listen to it, then I am not gonna be the guy to give you shit for it (joking around is on the table, but it's never mean-spirited). But if we're assuming that Kailyn really does consider Strummin' on Garth by Brooks Jefferson to be one of her favorite albums of all time, then... I mean, I don't even know what to do. I have to judge her, right? Or at least question her intentions?
This has nothing to do with whether the album is good or bad. With Brooks Jefferson, quality is almost besides the point. No, I take issue with this choice mostly due to the fact that Brooks Jefferson doesn't even fucking exist.
Let's start from the beginning. Here's where I was when I was doing preliminary research on which of Kailyn's albums
to choose for Record Club. After figuring out that the album was called
Strummin' on Garth and not "
Strummin' On" as Kailyn originally typo'd, my first question was: who is Brooks Jefferson? So naturally, if you have that question, you google it. Except, 999 times out of 1000, a search for a musician brings you to their Wikipedia page or their own website or their Instagram or
something like that. But for Brooks Jefferson, all the search results reflected my question back at me: Who is Brooks Jefferson?
So immediately, something is off. I find the album on Spotify and Apple and Amazon but almost nowhere else. It exists as an album that's streaming but that doesn't exist outside of that, which is fucking weird, right? I'm looking at the tracklist, and I don't know much Garth Brooks but I am familiar with the song "Friends in Low Places," and there it is. So then I start googling the titles of some of the other songs, and I figure out that this is a Garth Brooks cover album. Weird, but not unheard of that an artist would cover another artist for a full album. But usually it's just presented as an artistic statement, ya know? Think about when
Cat Power covered a
Bob Dylan live album last year. Shit like that. It's meant to be it's own thing in addition to being connected intimately to another artist. But
Strummin' on Garth didn't seem like that at all. This just seemed like an artist who covered Garth Brooks 21 times and put those covers on streaming and then disappeared into the ether. It still doesn't answer the question: who the
fuck is Brooks Jefferson?
There is probably more confusion than there would be for other artists, because Garth Brooks has had an alter ego before—Chris Gaines. This is Brooks' former "rock persona," created so that he could explore music outside of country music. He released
one album under this moniker, but it's not like the whole thing was a secret. The name "Garth Brooks" is right there in the title! And so, because of this I guess, some people online speculate that Brooks Jefferson is actually Garth Brooks in disguise. Their reasoning is that Garth Brooks is famously against streaming, and so this would be a way to put his music online without backtracking on his anti-Spotify stance.
I don't buy it. There are many reasons I don't buy it (including the fact that Garth Brooks is too busy putting together seven-album CD packages to be
exclusively sold at Bass Pro Shops). But one is that it doesn't really make sense logically that Brooks would rerecord his music to put on streaming, since that seems like a lot of work, and if the streaming cash flow was
that much of a big deal to him, then he'd just
put his music on streaming. Right? I mean, I hate streaming as much as the next fucking guy, but if I'm poised to make millions of dollars off of it, then there are really only two options here—stream it and get that cash, or don't stream it and hold fast to your morals. There's no third/middle option that makes sense. Secretly streaming under the moniker "Brooks Jefferson" means that you are both callously dismissing your previously held beliefs while
also losing out on a bunch of money. It would be a lose-lose proposition.
My take on it is less whimsical then "secret persona!" and is way more cynical but does seem to follow Occam's razor in that it's the simplest explanation. The simplest explanation is that the structure of Spotify makes it ripe for swindlers to take advantage of the passive consumer, and so Brooks Jefferson is one of those swindlers. He's just some fucking guy, some musician who can do a serviceable Garth Brooks impression, and has recorded cover songs, and has put them on streaming to take full advantage of the fact that Garth Brooks himself is not on there.
Imagine you're a tepid Garth Brooks fan, in that you like some of his songs, and you want to play his songs during a family gathering, to be played in the background. But you don't really give that much of a shit about music, and so you have no idea what's up with Garth Brooks vs. Spotify, and you search "Garth Brooks," and nothing comes up. But because of the "Brooks," you get "Brooks Jefferson," and you see that all the songs you recognize are there, and you hear that those songs are mostly like the Garth Brooks songs you know anyway, and so you play it. You play the songs because you don't give a shit, you just wanna hear the pop-country songs from the '90s and '00s that you know. That's what we call around these parts an "average listener." And there are enough average listeners out there that the dude behind Brooks Jefferson—whoever he is—is getting paid.
I don't mean to make it seem like I'm the only person who gives a shit about the fakery of this endeavor, like it's me vs. a countless hoard of average listeners who could not give less of a shit about any of this. There are breadcrumbs that I followed to get to my current cynical position. I listened to
this four-minute clip from some radio show in which they were discussing the matter. You don't have to listen to it (unless you wanna hear their background music of
"Never Gonna Give You Up" while you hear these two jabronis yuk it up), because they more or less reach the same conclusion. One of their correspondences indicates that he "went down the rabbit hole" looking for answers, and found the name "Dylan Miller" as a possible face behind the name Brooks Jefferson. They apparently sound alike, when you listen to Miller's stuff on streaming. It could be. Ultimately, though, it doesn't matter if Dylan Miller is real or a mask behind a mask. It's still all a fabrication, a hoax made in pursuit of grabbing every spare dollar off the dirty corporate floor of the music streaming conglomerates.
Which brings us back to Kailyn, and the fact that it is fucking INSANE that anyone in their right fucking mind would specifically choose Strummin' on Garth—a glorified covers album made cravenly in pursuit of a bottom dollar by a completely fake artist—as one of her favorite albums of all time.
Again, I'm not blasting the music. I actually think this is fucking hilarious, musically speaking, because I'm not familiar with Garth Brooks, and this is my first real exposure to a lot of his best-known songs. There is somewhat of a concerted push from
at least one Yearlong Song Challenger to make us appreciate this type of stadium-sized '90s country music, but I don't need convincing. I don't think it's bad. I don't like it enough to actively seek it out, but it's not bad, especially if the artist is at least apolitcal, if not making dog whistles toward progressive ideals held close. This is
not a matter of me saying "well now I can appreciate Garth Brooks a little more!" I don't need to do that. I've hit my ceiling when it comes to appreciating this dude's music. I just think it's extremely funny that, because of the bonkers choice of favorite albums by a stranger I'll never meet, the only versions of some Garth Brooks songs I'll know after this week are made by some fucking con artist who only made this shit to steal the money and attention of the normies on Spotify. It's beautiful in its twisted backwards ugliness, the whole fucking thing.
If we're using Occam's razor on ol' Brooks Jefferson, then we might as well use it for Kailyn as well. Under the guidelines constructed under this makeshift twelve-week sojourn in the musical mind of a stranger, we must be kind to Kailyn. It would not be kind to come to the conclusion here that "Kailyn must be henceforth confined to an insane asylum," or even "Kailyn must have shitty taste in music if not only is she choosing Garth Brooks songs as some of her favorite of all time, but she's choosing a thin-veneer xerox copy of them as one of her favorite albums of all time!" I'm not interested in making such claims. I am interesting in figuring out the mysteries that are surrounding this pick, and I think, beyond the mystery of "Who is Brooks Jefferson?", the most pressing mystery to be solved is "How did Kailyn end up including this on her list of favorite albums?"
Occam's razor reminds us of
something we previously discussed—how Kailyn chose albums based on a couple of songs, and not the albums on a whole. But now I'm actually trying to picture Kailyn physically putting together this list for her stranger-pal in Philadelphia, and I'm picturing her scrolling through a playlist on Spotify and picking out some songs that she likes. It could be that she didn't even think about it all that much, she just picked out some songs, and wrote down the albums to which they were attached. I think it's very likely that she saw the song "Friends in Low Places" on her playlist, and then absentmindedly wrote down the artist and album that was attached to that song on Spotify. It's not that hard to imagine. I personally would not have given
any of this even a second of thought for the entirety of my life if someone hadn't specifically told me it was their favorite album and I had a blog on which to parse through that claim. Seriously, it would have gone in my eyes and out my ass and I would have forgotten about it within another 30 seconds or so. So why shouldn't Kailyn be afforded the same opportunity to not care?
Well... I mean, if we're saying that—and we are, because there is no other explanation, fucking
none—then that means that Kailyn didn't care about... me. I guess. I don't mean to write that and make it seem like I'm sad over it. If that was her reaction, then hers was the
normal reaction. It would be normal to receive a low-stakes request from some guy whom you interacted with briefly two years prior and to react with general disinterest. What's
abnormal is someone taking the answer to that request and building an entire blogging cottage industry out of it, spending months parsing through your answer, trying to pick up clues that are supposedly there, and ultimately forming judgments on you that have absolutely no basis in reality no matter which way you turn.
That would be the abnormal thing to do. Not caring? Totally normal.
And so we rest on the idea of Kailyn not caring. That's fine. Honestly, it's easier to swallow than the reality in which someone sees Strummin' on Garth by Brooks Jefferson and claims that this must be one of their favorite albums of all time. For that to be a serious answer to this very serious question would mean that my universe is going to completely just fucking implode and then cease to exist and that I would disappear in the blink of an eye, so thoroughly has everything I ever cared about been debunked. So we can't have that. Let's just say that Kailyn doesn't care. That's easier.
I care, though. Which, obviously, is the problem.
GRADE: 0 pukes out of 5
A PICTURE FROM KAILYN'S OLD INSTAGRAM THAT BEST ENCAPSULATES THE EXPERIENCE OF LISTENING TO THIS ALBUM:
THE FULL LIST, IN ORDER OF COVERAGE: